![]() ![]() Such an approach will help to discern unexplained gap sightings, but even then there's no guarantee that all sightings can be explained. To understand UAP, better targeted data collection, thorough data curation, and robust analyses are needed. "They're often uninformative due to lack of quality control, and data curation. ![]() "The current existing data and eyewitness reports alone are insufficient to provide conclusive evidence about the nature and origin of every UAP event," he concluded. He even suggested that the agency could develop a mobile app that allows people to submit and share sightings. Instead, NASA should focus on encouraging public collection of data in a more systematic way, and reduce the stigma of reporting UAP: if you see something odd, you're not a loon for letting Uncle Sam know. Spy satellite takes an image of a balloon, as we've had in the news some balloons recently, that's classified, and that's because of a desire to not reveal our technical capabilities to other nations." ![]() The camera on an F-35 took a picture of a bird: it's classified. "The defense and intelligence agency data on UAP are often classified primarily because of how the data is collected," he said, "not because what's in the data. The panel only analyzed unclassified events, and hopes to publish its findings in a report later this year. The objects could be aircraft flown by other countries for defense or intelligence purposes, such as China's not-spying-spy balloons spotted earlier this year more often than not they're benign, like the reported Bart Simpson balloon. NASA defines UAP as "observations of events in the sky that cannot be identified as aircraft or known natural phenomena from a scientific perspective." Although people, generally speaking, look at weird stuff in the sky and wonder, however briefly, if it's evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence, the US government is more interested in whether these sightings are of foreign hardware that poses a threat to national security. US military spends weekend shooting down Useless Floating Objects.Nearly 1 in 5 academics admit close encounters of the anomalous kind.Pentagon shoots down UFO rumors but says 650 cases are still pending.NASA picks its UFO-hunting – sorry – unidentified aerial phenomena-hunting team.This lack of high-quality data makes it impossible to draw scientific conclusions on the nature of UAP." "Additionally, an object's background can complicate the data further and render it unusable due to conventional objects that can mimic or overshadow the phenomena completely, such as commercial aircraft, military equipment to the weather, and ionospheric phenomenon like auroras. Right up until his death in 2004, Cooper continued to speak out. Perhaps none more passionately and consistently though than, Gordon Cooper. "The existing data available from eyewitness reports are often muddled and cannot provide conclusive evidence that supports the UAP recognition and analysis. Several NASA astronauts have gone on record to state their beliefs in UFOs, their origin, and of extra-terrestrial life. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |